OAS

 
Antidumping: Data
 


  Antidumping Actions in the Western Hemisphere: July- June Annual Report
Initiations, Provisional Measures, Definitive Duties, Price Undertakings, and Measures in Force
 

 Note:  a listing of products and targeted countries affected by the initiations and measures adopted by the reporting countries is available beginning in the year 2001-02. To access the listing, click on the underlined data.

Importing Country

Type of
measure

1995-96 96-97

97-98

98-99

99-00

 2000-01

 01-02

02-03

Argentina

IN 1

42 18 8 15 23 44 26 4

PM 1

0 11 6 5 7 8 30 13

DD 1

21 9 13 9 10 13 26 25

PU 1

0 3 0 3 1 1 4 4

MF 1

28 32 37 42 45 45 58 77

Brazil

IN

1 19 12 12 17 10 16 9

PM

3 1 0 2 6 0 0 1

DD

9 1 8 7 12 11 0 4

PU

0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0

MF

20 23 23 35 42 52 53 56

Canada

IN

6 8 10 17 11 41 6 7

PM

12 8 10 13 12 38 3 5

DD

6 3 5 10 18 12 10 1

PU

0 0 0 1 0 1 3 0

MF

96 95 75 77 88 89 90 87

Chile

IN

4 2 2 0 1 4 0 ---

PM

0 2 0 2 0 0 0 ---

DD

0 2 0 2 0 0 0 ---

PU

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ---

MF

0 2 0 2 0 0 0 ---

Colombia

IN

5 1 0 8 3 0 6 0

PM

1 0 1 3 0 0 1 0

DD

0 1 1 4 2 0 0 0

PU

0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0

MF

7 7 8 13 12 13 13 11

Costa Rica

IN

--- --- --- 1 0 --- 0 0

PM

--- --- --- 0 0 --- 0 0

DD

--- --- --- 0 0 --- 0 0

PU

--- --- --- 0 0 --- 0 0

MF

--- --- --- 0 0 --- 0 0

Jamaica

IN

--- --- --- --- --- --- 2 0

PM

--- --- --- --- --- --- 2 0

DD

--- --- --- --- --- --- 1 1

PU

--- --- --- --- --- --- 0 0

MF

--- --- --- --- --- --- 2 3

Mexico

IN

3 5 8 12 7 4 11 8

PM

1 9 5 7 7 4 5 6

DD

20 4 6 9 5 6 1 5

PU

3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

MF

61 100 89 88 80 66 61 54

Panama

IN

--- --- --- 2 0 0 0 0

PM

--- --- --- 0 0 0 0 0

DD

--- --- --- 0 0 0 0 0

PU

--- --- --- 0 0 0 0 0

MF

--- --- --- --- --- 0 0 0

Peru

IN

4 3 5 5 4 0 11 8

PM

1 3 1 4 3 1 8 4

DD

2 3 1 1 6 1 3 6

PU

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MF

2 6 7 7 14 15 18 23

Trinidad & Tobago

IN

--- --- 0 5 0 1 1 2

PM

--- --- 1 1 5 1 0 1

DD

--- --- 0 0 1 2 0 1

PU

--- --- 0 0 0 1 0 0

MF

--- --- --- 2 5 5 4 4

United States

IN

16 20 28 43 17 77 58 29

PM

13 22 15 33 24 35 62 21

DD

17 15 12 19 18 20 46 13

PU

0 0 5 1 1 0 0 0

MF

307 305 322 336 300 241 264 278

 Uruguay

IN

--- --- --- --- --- 3 1 0

PM

--- --- --- --- --- 0 1 0

DD

--- --- --- --- --- 0 0 1

PU

--- --- --- --- --- 0 0 0

MF

--- --- --- --- --- --- 0 1

Venezuela

IN

5 0 7 10 0 2 0 1

PM

1 2 0 11 5 1 0 0

DD

0 0 2 5 3 0 0 1

PU

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MF

4 3 5 9 19 19 19 16

Sources: Data from 1995 to 2003:  WTO Reports of the Committee on Anti-Dumping Practices.


1
IN: Initiations  
   PM:
Provisional Measures
   DD: Definitive Duties
   PU: Price Undertakings in Force
   MF: Measures in Force

 

Initiations
"Article 5 of the Agreement establishes the requirements for the initiation of investigations. The Agreement specifies that investigations should generally be initiated on the basis of written request submitted 'by or on behalf of' a domestic industry. This 'standing' requirement includes numerical limits for determining whether there is sufficient support by domestic producers to conclude that the request is made by or on behalf of the domestic industry, and thereby warrants initiation. The Agreement establishes requirements for evidence of dumping, injury, and causality, as well as other information regarding the product, industry, importers, exporters, and other matters, in written applications for anti-dumping relief, and specifies that, in special circumstances when authorities initiate without a written application from a domestic industry, they shall proceed only if they have sufficient evidence of dumping, injury, and causality. In order to ensure that investigations without merit are not continued, potentially disrupting legitimate trade, Article 5.8 provides for immediate termination of investigations in the event the volume of imports is negligible or the margin of dumping is de minimis, and establishes numeric thresholds for these determinations. In order to minimize the trade-disruptive effect of investigations, Article 5.10 specifies that investigations should be completed within one year, and in no case more than 18 months, after initiation."
(WTO Website. Explanation of the Antidumping Agreement. Last visited July 2003)                         

Back to the table

Provisional Measures
"Article 7 of the Agreement provides rules relating to the imposition of provisional measures. These include the requirement that authorities make a preliminary affirmative determination of dumping, injury, and causality before applying provisional measures, and the requirement that no provisional measures may be applied sooner than 60 days after initiation of an investigation. Provisional measures may take the form of a provisional duty or, preferably, a security by cash deposit or bond equal to the amount of the preliminarily determined margin of dumping. The Agreement also contains time limits for the imposition of provisional measures - generally four months, with a possible extension to six months at the request of exporters."
(WTO Website. Explanation of the Antidumping Agreement. Last visited July 2003)

Back to the table

Price Undertakings
" Article 8 of the Agreement contains rules on the offering and acceptance of price undertakings, in lieu of the imposition of anti-dumping duties. It establishes the principle that undertakings between any exporter and the importing Member, to revise prices, or cease exports at dumped prices, may be entered into to settle an investigation, but only after a preliminary affirmative determination of dumping, injury and causality has been made. It also establishes that undertakings are voluntary on the part of both exporters and investigating authorities. In addition, an exporter may request that the investigation be continued after an undertaking has been accepted, and if a final determination of no dumping, no injury, or no causality results, the undertaking shall automatically lapse." (WTO Website. Explanation of the Antidumping Agreement. Last visited July 2003)

Back to the table

Definitive Duties & Measures in Force
"Article 9 establishes the general principle that imposition of anti-dumping duties is optional, even if all the requirements for imposition have been met, and establishes the desirability of application a “lesser duty” rule. Under a lesser duty rule, authorities impose duties at a level lower than the margin of dumping but adequate to remove injury. Article 9.3 establishes that anti-dumping duties may not exceed the dumping margin calculated during the investigation. In order to ensure that anti-dumping duties in excess of the margin of dumping are not collected, Article 9.3 requires procedures for determination of the actual amount of duty owed, or refund of excess duties paid, depending on the duty assessment system of a Member, normally within 12 months of a request, and in no case more than 18 months. Article 9.4 establishes rules for calculating the amount of duties to be imposed on exporters not individually examined during the investigation. Article 9.5 provides for expedited reviews to calculate individual margins of dumping for exporters or producers newly entering the market of the importing Member."
(WTO Website. Explanation of the Antidumping Agreement. Last visited July 2003)

"Article 10 establishes the general principle that both provisional and final anti-dumping duties may be applied only as of the date on which the determinations of dumping, injury, and causality have been made. However, recognizing that injury may have occurred during the period of investigation, or that exporters may have taken actions to avoid the imposition of an anti-dumping duty, Article 10 contains rules for the retroactive imposition of dumping duties in specified circumstances. If the imposition of anti-dumping duties is based on a finding of material injury, as opposed to threat of material injury or material retardation of the establishment of a domestic industry, anti-dumping duties may be collected as of the date provisional measures were imposed." ( WTO Website. Explanation of the Antidumping Agreement. Last visited July 2003)

"Article 11 of the Agreement establishes rules for the duration of anti-dumping duties, and requirements for periodic review of the continuing need, if any, for the imposition of anti-dumping duties or price undertakings. These requirements respond to the concern raised by the practice of some countries of leaving anti-dumping duties in place indefinitely. The 'sunset' requirement establishes that dumping duties shall normally terminate no later than five years after first being applied, unless a review investigation prior to that date establishes that expiry of the duty would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. This five year "sunset" provision also applies to price undertakings. The Agreement requires authorities to review the need for the continued imposition of a duty upon request of an interested party." (WTO Website. Explanation of the Antidumping Agreement. Last visited July 2003)

Back to the table

 

Versión en inglés