
Commercial Arbitration and Other Alternative Dispute Resolution Methods
The Montevideo Convention
Inter-American Convention on Extraterritorial Validity of Foreign Judgments and
Arbitral Awards
The Governments of the Member States of the Organization of American States,
CONSIDERING that the administration of justice in the American States requires their mutual cooperation for the
purpose of ensuring the extraterritorial validity of judgments and arbitral awards rendered in their respective territorial jurisdictions as follows:
Article 1
This Convention shall apply to judgments and arbitral awards rendered in civil, commercial or labor proceedings in one
of the States Parties, unless at the time of ratification it makes an express reservation to limit the Convention to
compensatory judgments (sentencias de condena) involving property. In addition, any one of them may declare, when
ratifying the Convention, that is also applies to rulings that end proceedings, to the decisions of authorities that
exercise some jurisdictional function and to judgments in penal proceedings ordering compensation for damages resulting
from an offense.
The rules of this Convention shall apply to arbitral awards in all matters not covered by the Inter-American Convention
on International Commercial Arbitration, signed in Panama on January 30, 1975.
Article 2
The foreign judgments, awards and decisions referred to in Article 1 shall have extraterritorial validity in the States
Parties if they meet the following conditions:
a. They fulfill all the formal requirements necessary for them to be deemed authentic in the State of origin;
b. The judgment, award or decision and the documents attached thereto that are required under this Convention
are duly translated into the official language of the State where they are to take effect;
c. They are presented duly legalized in accordance with the law of the State in which they are to take effect;
d. The judge or tribunal rendering the judgment is competent in the international sphere to try the matter and
to pass judgment on it in accordance with the law of the State in which the judgment, award or decision is to take effect;
e. The plaintiff has been summoned or subpoenaed in due legal form substantially equivalent to that accepted by
the law of the State where the judgment, award or decision is to take effect;
f. The parties had an opportunity to present their defense;
g. They are final or, where appropriate have the force of res judicata in the State in which they were
rendered;
h. They are not manifestly contrary to the principles and laws of the public policy (ordre public) of the State
in which recognition of execution is sought.
Article 3
The documents of proof required to request execution of judgments, awards and decisions are as follows:
a. A certified copy of the judgment, award or decision;
b. A certified copy of the documents proving that the provisions of items (e) and (f) of the foregoing
article have been compiled with; and
c. A certified copy of the document stating that the judgment, award or decision is final or has the force of
res judicata.
Article 4
If a foreign judgment, award or decision cannot be executed in its entirety, the judge or tribunal may agree to its
partial execution at the request of an interested party.
Article 5
The declaration in forma pauperis recognized in the State of origin of the judgment shall be recognized
in the State of destination.
Article 6
The procedures for ensuring the validity of foreign judgments, awards and decisions, including the jurisdiction of
the respective judges and tribunals, shall be governed by the law of the State in which execution is sought.
Article 7
This Convention shall be open for signature by the Member States of the Organization of American States.
Article 8
This Convention is subject to ratification. The instruments of ratification
shall be deposited with the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States.
Article 9
This Convention shall remain open for accession by any other State. The instrument of accession shall be deposited
with the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States.
Article 10
Each State may, at the time of signature, ratification or accession, make reservations to this Convention, provided
that each reservation concerns one or more specific provisions and is not incompatible with the object and purpose
of the Convention.
Article 11
This Convention shall enter into force on the thirtieth day following the date of
deposit of the second instrument of ratification.
For each State ratifying or acceding to the Convention after the deposit of the second instrument of ratification,
the Convention shall enter into force on the thirtieth day after deposit by such State of its instrument of
ratification or accession.
Article 12
If a State Party has two or more territorial units in which different systems of law apply in relation to the matters
dealt with in this Convention, it may, at the time of signature, ratification or accession, declare that this Convention
shall extend to all its territorial units or only to one or more of them.
Such declaration may be modified by subsequent declarations, which shall expressly indicate the territorial unit or units
to which this Convention applies. Such subsequent declarations shall be transmitted to the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States and shall become effective thirty days after the date of their receipt.
Article 13
This Convention shall remain in force indefinitely, but any of the States Parties may denounce it. The instrument of
denunciation shall be deposited with the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States. After one year
from the date of deposit of the instrument of denunciation, the Convention shall no longer be in effect for the
denouncing State, but shall remain in effect for the other States Parties.
Article 14
The original instrument of this Convention, the English, French, Portuguese and Spanish texts of which are equally
authentic, shall be deposited with the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States, which will forward
an authenticated copy of its text to the Secretariat of the United Nations for registration and publication in accordance
with Article 102 of its Charter. The General Secretariat of the Organization of American States shall notify the Member
States of that Organization and the States that have acceded to the Convention of the signatures, deposits of instruments
of ratification, accession and denunciation as well as of reservations, if any. It shall also transmit the declarations
referred to in Article 12 of this Convention.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned Plenipotentiaries, being duly authorized thereto by their respective
Governments, have signed this Convention.
DONE AT MONTEVIDEO, Republic of Uruguay, this eighth day of May, one thousand nine hundred and seventy-nine.
Signatories, dates of ratification and of deposit of ratification instrument, declarations/reservations by Brazil, Mexico
and Uruguay
B-41: INTERAMERICAN CONVENTION ON TERRITORIAL EFFECTIVENESS OF FOREIGN ARBITRATION
AWARDS
ADOPTED IN: MONTEVIDEO, URUGUAY
DATE: 08/05/79
CONF/ASSEEMBLY/MEETING: SECOND SPECIALIZED INTERAMERICAN CONFERENCE ON PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW
IN FORCE: 14/06/80 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 23 OF THE CONVENTION
DEPOSITORY: SECRETARIAT GENERAL OF THE OAS (ORIGINAL INSTRUMENT AND RATIFICATIONS)
TEXT: SERIES ON TREATIES, OAS, NO. 51
UN REGISTRATION: 20/03/89 No. 24392 Vol.
REMARKS: The convention is open for the signature of the Members of the Organization of American States and
the accession of any other State.
GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TREATY: B-41
SIGNATORY COUNTRIES |
DATE |
REF |
RA/AC/AD |
REF |
DEPOSIT |
INST. |
REPORTS REF |
Argentina |
01/12/83 |
|
07/11/83 |
|
01/12/83 |
RA |
/ / |
Bolivia |
02/08/83 |
|
15/05/98 |
|
08/10/98 |
|
/ / |
Brazil |
08/05/79 |
R 1 |
31/08/95 |
|
27/11/95 |
RA |
/ / |
Chile |
08/05/79 |
|
/ / |
|
/ / |
|
/ / |
Colombia |
08/05/79 |
|
24/06/81 |
|
10/09/81 |
RA |
/ / |
Costa Rica |
08/05/79 |
|
/ / |
|
/ / |
|
/ / |
Ecuador |
08/05/79 |
|
05/05/82 |
|
06/01/82 |
RA |
/ / |
El Salvador |
11/08/80 |
|
/ / |
|
/ / |
|
/ / |
Guatemala |
08/05/79 |
|
/ / |
|
/ / |
|
/ / |
Haiti |
08/05/79 |
|
/ / |
|
/ / |
|
/ / |
Honduras |
08/05/79 |
|
/ / |
|
/ / |
|
/ / |
Mexico |
02/12/86 |
|
11/02/87 |
DR a |
12/06/87 |
RA |
/ / |
Panama |
08/05/79 |
|
/ / |
|
/ / |
|
/ / |
Paraguay |
08/05/79 |
|
05/07/85 |
|
16/08/85 |
RA |
/ / |
Peru |
08/05/79 |
|
09/04/80 |
|
15/05/80 |
RA |
/ / |
Dominican Republic |
08/05/79 |
|
/ / |
|
/ / |
|
/ / |
Uruguay |
08/05/79 |
D 2 |
12/02/80 |
D b |
15/05/83 |
RA |
/ / |
Venezuela |
08/05/79 |
|
30/01/85 |
|
28/02/85 |
RA |
/ / |
REF = REFERENCE
D = STATEMENT
R = RESERVATIONS
REPORTS = INFORMATION REQUIRED BY THE TREATY |
INST = TYPE OF INSTRUMENT
RA = RATIFICATION
AC = ACCEPTANCE
AD = ACCESSION
|
B-41. INTERAMERICAN CONVENTION ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EXTRATERRITORIAL JUDGMENTS AND ARBITRATION AWARDS
1. Brazil:
(Reservation made upon signing the Convention)
Reservation as regards letter d) , Article 2.
2. Uruguay:
Scope granted to Public Order:
The Republic of Uruguay states that it expressly ratifies the line of thought expressed by Panama –CIDIP-I—reaffirming
its true Pan-American spirit and its clear and positive decision of contributing with its ideas and vote, to the
effective development of the legal community.
This line of thought and conduct has been demonstrated without doubt, with the ratification without reserves by
Uruguay, of all the Panama Conventions approved by Law N 14.534 of 1976.
In accordance with the above, the Republic of Uruguay votes affirmatively for the public order formula, without
prejudice of expressly and clearly pointing out, according to the position expressed in Panama, that according
with its interpretation of the above mentioned exception, this refers to international public order, as a singular
legal institution, not necessarily identified with the internal public order of each State.
Therefore, in the opinion of the Republic of Uruguay, the formula approved involves an exceptional authorization
to the different Party States, so that in a non-discretionary and justified manner, declare non-applicable the
precepts of the foreign law, when these offend in a specific, serious and manifest manner, the essential
regulations and principles of international public order, on which each State bases its legal individuality.
B-41/2
a. Mexico:
(Reservation and interpretive statements made upon ratification of the Convention)
Reservation:
Article 1
As regards Article 1 of the Convention, Mexico expressly states its reservation to limit its application to the
judgments passed in one of the Party States, imposing sentences involving assets.
Interpretive Declarations:
Article 2
As regards Article 2 , paragraph d) of the Convention, Mexico declares that said condition shall be considered upheld
when the authority of the judge or tribunal that has been established to coincide with the rules acknowledged by the
Interamerican Convention, on the Basis of Jurisdiction in the International Sphere, for the Extraterritorial EFFECTIVENESS
of the Foreign Judgments and Awards, excluding all subjects referring to Article 6 of the same instrument, subscribed in
La Paz, Bolivia, on May 24, 1984.
Article 3
Likewise, as regards to Article 3, the United States of Mexico interpret that for the harmonization and coercive execution
of the foreign judgments and awards, it is necessary to make them known by means of petitions or rogatory letters, where
the necessary citations appear, so that the Parties can appear before the petitioner.
Article 6
Mexico interprets Article 6 of the Convention in the sense that the petitioned judge has jurisdiction in all related
procedures, to insure the execution of the sentences, including, among others, those concerning attachments, receiverships, mediation/arbitration and public sales.
|